EdTechLab

Case Studies

Product proof, workflow evidence, and the design choices behind them.

The case-study library is intentionally evidence-led: visible workflows, screenshots, walkthroughs, constraints, and next validation steps.

Case-study index map

Source material

Reading pack, PDF

Case study

EngagedLab workflow

Static content to interactive lab to LMS-ready bundle.

Theme

Structured lab

Sequenced activities

Outcome

LMS handoff

SCORM 1.2 bundle

Evidence

Demo walkthrough

30s, real screens

A case-study index map: PDF source material flows into the EngagedLab case study, which connects out to three documented themes and outcomes — a structured interactive lab, a SCORM LMS handoff, and a recorded demo walkthrough.

EngagedLab student-facing interactive lab preview.

Featured case study

EngagedLab: from static course content to interactive lab workflow.

Walk a real reading pack from PDF source to a sequenced interactive lab to a Blackboard-ready SCORM bundle. The case study shows screens, design constraints, and the LMS handoff path.

3

production screens

SCORM 1.2

LMS handoff

30s

demo walkthrough

EngagedLab studio view, showing the activity sequencer.
Screen 01 Studio view — activity sequence and learning-type tagging.
EngagedLab editor with the SCORM export menu open.
Screen 04 Export menu — SCORM 1.2, Blackboard, and SCORM 2004 delivery paths.
EngagedLab student-facing interactive lab preview.
Screen 07 Student preview — what learners actually see and do.
Scientific case study · interacty

Why iteration, not generation, is the real product in interactive learning content.

A peer‑style case study by Saad Saihi: one‑shot AI generation is commoditised, so the advantage is making the 10–35 rounds of refinement cheap and trustworthy — with a deterministic architecture that makes the preview byte‑identical to the shipped SCORM package. Backed by six packages deployed in Blackboard and the active‑learning evidence base.

Read the case study

δ = 0

preview‑to‑ship drift

≈ 7×

cheaper to iterate

0.47 SD

active‑learning lift

In flight

What the next case studies will document.

Each entry below is an active piece of work. We publish case studies when the workflow, evidence and handoff are real — not before.

Become a case study partner
Sky ATP

Acquisition Testing Phase, R1 university

Six-week structured trial against an institution's own VLE: three module leaders, a student preview, an AI tutor red-team against local GenAI policy, and a sample Evidence Pack export reviewed by QA.

  • · Letter of Intent signed
  • · Module canvases in build
  • · Evidence Pack format under QA review

Publish target · Q3 2026

intle pilot

Instrumented study pilots

intle gives study teams a low-friction way to capture pre-registered protocol drift, evidence quality and decision-use signals while a research module is live.

  • · Two HE research teams onboarded
  • · Event schema v2 in review
  • · Pre-publication walkthrough in design

Publish target · Q4 2026

Services engagement

Research-aware workflow rebuild

A services engagement turning a fragmented set of study tools into a coordinated workflow, with operational analytics and an institutional handoff plan.

  • · Discovery + journey mapping complete
  • · Prototype week underway
  • · Pilot scoping with QA team

Publish target · Q1 2027

What you'll find inside every EdTechLab case study

Visible product. Documented constraints. Honest next steps.

Workflow walkthrough

Real screens in sequence — not stock UI.

Evidence quality

Event structure, analytics, accessibility, governance.

Constraints faced

What we kept, what we cut, what we deferred and why.

Next validation

The specific next step — pilot, evidence pack, handoff.

Discuss a product idea

Want to review interacty, intle, or EngagedLab properly — or shape a new research product with EdTechLab?